Ta informacja jest już w innym wątku.
Czy sądzi Pani, że ja o tym nie wiem?
Z analizy, którą przeprowadziłem, porównując wskaźniki umieralności niemowląt i kalendarze szczepień w krajach europejskich, wynika, że najniższe wartości tego wskaźnika są w krajach, które nie szczepią dzieci przed 3 miesiącem życia.
Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with r = 0.992 (p = 0.0009).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/ Is there evidence linking SIDS to vaccines?
Although some studies were unable to find correlations between SIDS and vaccines,22–24 there is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example, Torch found that two-thirds of babies who had died from SIDS had been vaccinated against DPT (diphtheria–pertussis–tetanus toxoid) prior to death. Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours of vaccination; 13% within 24 hours; 26% within 3 days; and 37%, 61%, and 70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively. Torch also found that unvaccinated babies who died of SIDS did so most often in the fall or winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months—the same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. He concluded that DPT “may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.”25 Walker et al. found “the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization.”26 Fine and Chen reported that babies died at a rate nearly eight times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT vaccination.27
Ottaviani et al. documented the case of a 3-month-old infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly shortly after being given six vaccines in a single shot: “Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby.” Without a full necropsy study in the case of sudden, unexpected infant death, at least some cases linked to vaccination are likely to go undetected.28
Conclusion
The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.
Efforts to reduce the relatively high US IMR have been elusive. Finding ways to lower preterm birth rates should be a high priority. However, preventing premature births is just a partial solution to reduce infant deaths. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs, is essential. All nations—rich and poor, advanced and developing—have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.
Tu jest drugi artykuł:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547435/ Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths reported to VAERS. In addition, younger infants were significantly more likely than older infants to be hospitalized or die after receiving vaccines.
A to moje obserwacje i hipotezy:
http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/kat,1027139,title,Tragicznie-wysoka-umieralnosc-polskich-niemowlakow-jest-gorzej-niz-na-Bialorusi,wid,15417132,wiadomosc.html Mój komentarz:
1. W krajach skandynawskich (szczególnie w Islandii) oraz w Słowenii i San Marino nie szczepi się dzieci przed 3 miesiącem życia. Stąd wskaźnik umieralności niemowląt jest tam najniższy.
http://www.euvac.net/graphics/euvac/vaccination/iceland.html http://www.euvac.net/graphics/euvac/vaccination/slovenia.html
San Marino – schemat szczepień
http://www.unicef.org/videoaudio/PDFs/EN-ImmSumm-2013.pdf str. 149
2. W Polsce (i na Malcie) wskaźnik jest wyższy niż w pozostałych krajach Europy Zachodniej (szczepiących przed 3 m.ż.), ponieważ liczba przerwań ciąży z powodu prenatalnie stwierdzonych wad wrodzonych jest u nas i na Malcie znacznie niższa. W Polsce wiele dzieci z wadami letalnymi rodzi się i umiera w pierwszym roku życia, stąd wyższy wskaźnik.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/mapeuropeabrate3big.gif 3. Ciekawe, że Polska, Litwa i Białoruś mają bardzo podobny wskaźnik. Kiedyś te trzy narody tworzyły wspólne państwo. Może utrzymał się podobny sposób odżywiania (tradycja kulinarna)?
4. W Polsce województwa mazowieckie, wielkopolskie i opolskie mają zapewne najlepszą neonatologię (nic innego nie przychodzi mi do głowy).
Pani Zosiu, naszym celem jest krzewienie wiedzy. Powinniśmy wierzyć, że doprowadzi to do przemiany świadomości. Taka jest postawa p. Józefa Słoneckiego i moja. Zachęcam Panią do większego optymizmu.